![]() "We're not going to pursue that in the remainder of our term, and we're not going to pursue it in the future. In April 2012, Walker told Wisconsin Public Radio, "I have no interest in a right-to-work law in this state." He believes border security must be the top priority before we can have a conversation about anything else." "He doesn't support amnesty and he's said he's learned more about this issue since Obama's unconstitutional executive action and he's seen how his fellow governors have had to deal with the collateral damage. ![]() Update: Walker's PAC spokeswoman clarified his views on immigration: But I don't think you do it through amnesty." And part of doing this is put the onus on employers, getting them E-Verify and tools to do that. We ultimately need to put in place a system that works. "And the concerns I have is that we need to secure the border. I've talked to people all across America," Walker explained. I've talked to governors on the border and others out there. "I look at the problems we've experienced for the last few years. Walker attributed his shift on amnesty to an increased awareness of the immigration system. However, on March 1, Walker acknowledged to Fox News that he has switched sides on the issue. In 2013, Walker told the Wausau Daily Herald "it makes sense" to provide a pathway for illegal immigrants to be granted citizenship, hinting his support for amnesty. Additionally, he wouldn't get rid of it on day one because there’s a level of certainty that farmers and producers depend on and we have to factor that in when phasing it out." Then, given the opportunity, he would work to address the root problem of market access and phase out the ethanol mandate. ![]() ![]() He believes consumer choice should drive ethanol use, but first the EPA has to uphold the law on the books and set the level. Speaking directly to the RFS as a potential candidate he has not and does not support the passage of new laws that require a specific percentage of ethanol use. "Governor Walker opposed the establishment of a state mandate, but hadn't weighed in on the RFS. Update (6:05 p.m.): A spokeswoman for Walker's PAC, Our American Revival, disputed the notion that Walker changed his view on the Renewable Fuel Standard: So that eventually you didn't need to have a standard." "It's an access issue, and so it's something I'm willing to go forward on continuing the Renewable Fuel Standard and pressing the EPA to make sure there's certainty in terms of the blend levels set," Walker said, adding, "Now, long term - we've talked about this before as well - my goal would be to get to a point where we directly address those market access issues and I think that's a part of the challenge. On March 7 at the Iowa Agriculture Summit, hosted by agribusiness mogul Bruce Rastetter, Walker sang a different tune when he was asked about his views on ethanol. "The free enterprise system must drive innovation to relieve our dependence on foreign oil, not mandates from the state or federal government." "It is clear to me that a big government mandate is not the way to support the farmers of this state," Walker said in a campaign radio ad. In 2006, during his first, short-lived, unsuccessful campaign for Governor of Wisconsin, Walker said he would not support an ethanol mandate. Here are three areas where Walker's positions have seemingly evolved: It appears to be the latest in a series of policy shifts for the GOP rising star.Īs he tightens his policy platform in the lead up to a possible 2016 presidential campaign, his past statements on several issues have also been called into question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |